Printable Version

"Blue Birds… Don’t Mix With Blackbirds"
 

The American South, since its existence has always been a hotbed regarding the topic of race relations. In particular, sexual relations between the races have served as the stuff of legend, rumor, and riot. Probably one of the most recognized examples is that of the relationship between Past President Thomas Jefferson and his slave, Sally Hemmings. In modern times, there has even been speculation that Strom Thurmond has fathered a black daughter (See ‘Strom’s Secret’ by Ken Cumins). A key word here is speculation. As many of us are forced (and some not so forced) to deal with the social construct of race, it’s particularly interesting how we as individuals subscribe to and apply the concept within our personal lives, and to how we see the world at large. To the question, ‘can’t we all just get along?’--well, of course we could. The more appropriate question is, “Will We?”

Interracial Intimacies:
Sex, Marriage, Identity, and Adoption


by Randall Kennedy



‘Race-mixin.’ Or miscegenation, the then proper word of the times that described the act of sex between the races. Randall Kennedy took the concept and dissected the effects of the issues it raised within the setting of the Deep South of the Americas in the 1950’s.

The book was sparked by Kennedy’s research on the legal study of the “Orphan in Dixie,” the mulatto child given away by her white mother to her white aunt, only to be passed off again to a married black couple. The couple was then left with a fight to legally adopt the ‘white’ child they had come to love as their own. The State of Louisiana recognized the child as ‘white,’ since it was indicated as such on her birth certificate, and state law prohibited adoption against color lines. Kennedy demonstrates in his book, Louisiana’s ‘punctilious’ behavior regarding racial categorization.

The story is less about politics, and more about how we struggle to incorporate the modern concept of race into our lives, and in particular into social and familial settings. When asked why he wrote a book pertaining to interracial sex, he stated that it was an area that was understudied. Noting, that while it is common to see studies of the effects of race within the realms of education, the workplace, housing, and the like; we less often study race relations within the institutions of friendship, dating, marriage, and family.

For emphasis, while at a forum introducing his book at the Margaret Mitchell Institute, he recalled an event of dialoging with a student over the concept of race. The student vehemently stated that racial categorization was not only illegal, but morally wrong. Kennedy asked the student if he thought that people who specify race within personal ads were committing an immoral act. To which he got no answer. One can assume the student was referring to racial categorization with respect to education, the workplace, housing, and the like.

[some kind of ‘break’ indicating the following is not related to the above book review]

…Later
In The Fall of 2000, the Harris County school system in Georgia experienced its own turmoil and tensions when one of their schools banned students from wearing the Confederate Flag emblem. As a subsequent counter measure, students were banned from wearing the urban FUBU label as well…www.newstribune.com/stories/100300/wor_1003000002.asp


HERITAGE – NOT HATE
An Old Problem in the New South

The Sons of Confederate Veterans [SCV] is a historical, patriotic, and non-political organization dedicated to insuring that a true history of the 1861-1865 period is preserved. Unfortunately, for some people, the Confederate “Stars and Bars” flag is the first thought they have of the period in American history when slavery was legal. While some may think the correctly-called Confederate Battle Flag represented the South’s affection with slavery, it was actually the United States Flag which flew over slave ships. “The square Confederate battle flag incorporated the Cross of St. Andrew, a Celtic Christian symbol, along with the stars and colors used in the national flag. Despite what some contemporary critics believe, the battle flag never served as a national flag of the Confederacy. Instead, the banner demonstrated the influence of Christianity among the troops and served as a rallying point for Confederate soldiers on the field of battle” (www.ncscv.org). While skinheads and neo-Nazis have tried to use this flag for their own diabolical purposes, the “…SCV rejects any group whose actions tarnish or distort the image of the Confederate soldier or his reasons for fighting” (www.scv.org). There were black, Jewish, Hispanic, and American Indians who fought for the South in the War of Northern Aggression; and, today, some of their ancestors are members of the SCV--which is open to all male descendants of any veteran who served honorably in the Confederate armed forces. A current SCV bumper sticker reads, simply, Heritage--Not Hate. The SCV supports the Southern Cause, that is, the reason that these men fought so tenaciously: “The preservation of liberty and freedom was the motivating factor in the South’s decision to fight the second American Revolution” (SCV Heritage of Honor brochure). These Southern soldiers wanted to protect their rights guaranteed by the Constitution as well as to protect their home state from Northern invasion. While specifically and categorically repudiating hatred and racism in any form, the SCV absolutely refuses to allow our ancestor’s history neither to be distorted or rewritten, nor to diminish the motives for their heroic suffering and sacrifice. The SCV exists to protect this unique part of our nation’s cultural heritage…and the true history of the South.

STAN LATTA, COMMANDER
PRIVATE HENRY L. WYATT CAMP # 1297
SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS
[RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA]


Other Readings